Workflow · Performance comparison & reporting

Compare creator and content performance to find your best assets

Treat your creator roster and Content Library like a portfolio — sort by Revenue, Cost, and ROAS to find what's actually worth doubling down on.

Marketing ManagerSocial Commerce Specialist3 min readUpdated Aug 21, 2026

Requires first

Follower count and view count tell you what got attention. Revenue, Cost, and ROAS tell you what got paid for itself. This workflow is about using the second set of numbers to actually rank your creators and content, instead of eyeballing the first set.

How this connects across Socialscale

Revenue, Cost & ROAS
My Creators
Content Library
Performance comparison

Before you start

This assumes the full chain from How content and creators become revenue-generating assets is actually in place — synced products, active AI Workforce, installed pixel. Comparing numbers that are only partially populated will rank things by data completeness, not by actual performance.

Setup checklist

0/3 done

Step 1: Rank creators by Revenue per video, not total Revenue

Open My Creators (Creator/Overview) and sort by Revenue per video rather than raw Revenue. A creator who's posted 40 times will often out-earn a creator who's posted 4 times on total Revenue alone — Revenue per video normalizes for that, and is the fairer comparison when you're deciding who to brief again (see My Creators: reading a creator's profile).

Pro tip

Cross-check the top of that list against Cost before treating it as a final ranking. A creator with strong Revenue per video and low Cost per video is a clearly better return than one matching on Revenue alone but costing significantly more to work with.

Step 2: Rank content by ROAS, not by reach

Switch to Content Library (Content/Overview) and sort by ROAS instead of views or Hook score. This is deliberately different from Dashboard's Top Videos leaderboard, which ranks by impressions — see Dashboard: your reporting home for why those two rankings can diverge and what that divergence tells you.

Note

Content with no Revenue yet isn't necessarily bad content — it may just not be tagged to a product, or too new for a sale to have landed inside the Attribution Window. Check Products (n) and age before ruling something out.

Step 3: Rank products the same way

Open Product Center and check Revenue, Cost, and ROAS at the product level. This answers a different question than the first two steps — not "who's my best creator" but "what's actually converting," which sometimes points to a product worth briefing more creators on rather than a specific creator worth paying more.

Step 4: Build your shortlist

Cross-reference all three rankings. The strongest signal isn't any single list — it's where they agree: a creator with strong Revenue per video, posting content with strong ROAS, about products that also rank well on their own. That combination is your clearest case for where to put more budget next cycle.

Pro tip

Keep this shortlist visible to whoever's briefing creators or approving collaboration spend — see Choosing a Collaboration Type for turning a shortlisted creator into an active, funded collaboration.

What good looks like

A useful comparison habit doesn't try to rank everything perfectly every time — it's a repeatable few minutes, done on a consistent cadence (pair it with your daily check-in weekly, say), that reliably surfaces the same handful of standout and underperforming assets rather than a different, noisy list every time you look.